Search for: "Sanders v. Fisher" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 8:55 am by Kali Borkoski
Next week the blog will host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Rick Sander, one of the country’s leading scholars of race-based affirmative action in higher education, will be guest-blogging for a few days on affirmative action, the “mismatch hypothesis” and the pending Fisher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:57 pm by Ilya Somin
I previously blogged about Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am by Mark Walsh
Anticipation is high for the last argument before the holiday break, and one of the biggest cases of the term, Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here (briefs in red below are those that mention Elizabeth Warren): Merit Briefs Brief for Petitioner Abigail Noel Fisher Amicus Briefs Brief for Abigail Thernstrom, Stephan Thernstrom, Althea K. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
Richard Sander and I demonstrated this in a 2012 book, Mismatch. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
in Minkow v Sanders ;2011 NY Slip Op 02120 ; Decided on March 24, 2011 ; Appellate Division, First Department  we see the fault placed on plaintiff's shoulders and the attorney obtaining dismisal of the legal malpractice case. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That request, noted yesterday on the Court’s docket for the case of Fisher v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 8:56 am by Walter Olson
The Washington Post humors the super-silly liberal fantasy of impeaching Justice Scalia for discussing the affirmative action mismatch argument, an argument that 1) was briefed by lawyers in the case at hand, Fisher v. [read post]